Showing posts with label popular science. Show all posts
Showing posts with label popular science. Show all posts

Sunday, May 17, 2026

This Island Earth

Although some scholars find the roots of science fiction in ancient myths and fantastic poems such as A True Story by Lucian of Samosata, the fact is that science fiction depends on science which did not exist before the Enlightenment of the 18th century. The word “scientist” was invented by William Whewell in a moment of argument with Samuel Taylor Coleridge at a meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science on 24 June 1833. Coleridge insisted that these people did not deserve the title “natural philosophers” and Whewell replied with a parallel to art and artists: “We are scientists.” The first issue of Scientific American was published on 28 August 1845.

Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is often cited but her own three versions tell only of Victor Frankenstein's explorations of medieval paradigms and the narrator is emphatic in not revealing his methods, lest they be duplicated with inevitably horrible consequences. Nobel laureate Steven Weinberg insisted in To Understand the World, that science depends on experiments which are purposefully unnatural arrangements to isolate the essential distinguishing actions of objects. Considering that thesis, we must grant that Victor Frankenstein pursued science, not mysticism. 


Jules Verne and H. G. Wells are commonly credited as the first narrators of adventures based on new scientific theories and their applications. Prior to them, John Leonard Riddell, chief melter at the New Orleans Mint, and a professor of chemistry at the New Orleans Medical College (which became Tulane University), published Orrin Lindsey's Plan of Aerial Navigation in 1847. Presaging the “golden age” of science fiction before the 1960s, the trip to the Moon is supported by laborious footnotes providing calculations, even for recycling breathable air by the same chemical methods used today. Riddell’s explanation of anti-gravity drive is necessarily sketchy though no more so than our faster-than-light warp drives. At a lecture at Michigan State University about 1976 or so, Gene Roddenberry said that when they need gravity on board a starship, they flip the gravity switch to On. 


In the book and movie, The Right Stuff, a news reporter first asks, “Do you know what makes these birds fly?” and an Air Force pilot starts to say, “Why the aerodynamics alone would take…” and he is cut off. “Funding,” is the reply. “No bucks, no Buck Rogers.” Every pilot at Pancho’s cantina knew exactly what was said. Later, the line is repeated by an astronaut arguing with a NASA administrator: “… and to the American people, we’re Buck Rogers.” 


This Island Earth is a 1955 American science fiction film 

produced by William Alland, directed by Joseph M. Newman 

and Jack Arnold, and starring Jeff Morrow, Faith Domergue, and Rex Reason.

The 1952 novel by [Raymond F.] Jones was originally serialized 

in the science fiction magazine Thrilling Wonder Stories as three 

related novelettes: "The Alien Machine" (June 1949), 

"The Shroud of Secrecy" (December 1949), and "The Greater Conflict"

(February 1950). Jones had taken the novel title from a line
in Robert Graves' 
poem "Darien":

It is a poet's privilege and fate
To fall enamoured of the one Muse
Who variously haunts this island earth

-Wikipedia — https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/This_Island_Earth

This Island Earth (NASA)
one of hundreds of science and
engineering titles de-acquisitioned by
the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.


"This Island Earth. Edited by Oran W. Nicks. NASA SP-250. Washington, D.C.: Scientific and Technical Information Division, Office of Technology Utilization, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1970. x+182 pages. For sale by Superintendent of Documents, $6.00 (Library of Congress Catalog Card no. 73-608969).  Reviewed by Julian R. Goldsmith, University of Chicago, The Journal of Geology, Volume 80 Number 3, May 1972. Also reviewed in Science News, Vol.117, P. 348, 1980, among other citations.


Previously on Necessary Facts


From Texas to the Moon with John Leonard Riddell 

Fantastic Voyages: Teaching Science with Science Fiction 

Monsters from the Id 

Psychohistory from Asimov’s Foundation to Big Data 


Thursday, November 27, 2025

Scientist

On Fridays, parking enforcement officers are allowed to wear UT spirit gear with our uniforms. I have a Texas Science t-shirt from the UT College of Natural Science. (I had to write a letter to get it.) After work, I was at the Wheatsville Co-op and one of my comrades there asked me, "Are you a scientist?" and I demurred, "No," adding "I am a citizen scientist. We live in a scientific era. Everyone should know their science." In the moment, identifying myself as a scientist seemed pretentious to me. If she had asked, "Are you an astronomer?" that identification would have been easier. Continuing  homeward, I reflected.    



Step 1: Observe. Most of my time at astronomy is given to simply enjoying the act of locating and viewing. One of my best catches was finding Messier 15 near the star Enif in Pegasus, a lighter gray within the gray sky of my citified suburb. Usually, I locate targets by star-hopping. Often, I rely on the database of a computerized mount. I also have made careful measurements within the limits of my instruments. (See "Merry Newtonmas 2020" here.) That being so, I have not advanced to asking questions and arranging tests.

It is the testing that identifies the scientific method of our modern society. Steven Weinberg said that the scientific experiment is defined by its being unnatural in the sense that a specific arrangement not found in nature is devised in order to test a theory of cause of an observed phenomenon. This differentiates our culture from the ancient observers. Thales and Hypatia would be astounded but not enlightened by my photographs of the Orion Nebula, the Whirlpool Galaxy, or the cells of an onion rind

Step 10: Publish Your Work. Independent verification of your discovery adds to the net wealth of the society you live in. 
History is a science. Building on the works of others and asking the right questions, I was able to construct a consistent narrative to explain the Mutiny Aboard the San Antonio
Reviews of the publications of other scientists.
My science degree is in criminology (Eastern Michigan University, 2008.)

My Master of Arts is in social science.

PREVIOUSLY ON NECESSARY FACTS

The Scientific Method (2021) 

The Scientific Method (2016) 

The Science of Liberty 

The Remarkable Story of Risk 


Sunday, September 14, 2025

ArmadilloCon 47 - 2025 September 12-14

Soon after I moved to Austin in 2011 and joined some local clubs in my interest areas  IEEE Fellow Kurt Baty invited me to attend ArmadilloCon. I replied, "I went to a Trekker con, and it was OK, but it is not really my thing." And he said, "Mike, this is not like any other science fiction convention. No one will be in Starfleet uniforms signing autographs. This is just for writers, artists, editors, and publishers--and, of course, readers." He was right. 

"Heresy! In the SFF Canon" - Linsey Miller, Jacob Weisman, Tracy Morris (moderator),

Amy Salley, Adrian Simmons. "What you hate most about long time favorites 

such as Larry Niven's Ringworld, Tolkien's Rings, Dune, and everything else."

I first attended ArmadilloCon 39 in 2017. Since then, Laurel and I have enjoyed many  panels. I also served on panels and delivered my own presentations. This year, I volunteered for the Registration Desk and the Hospitality Suite and found a couple of readings from our stalwart authors. Mostly, I had time enough to chat.

Dealers Room Opening Night

Friday afternoon, I attended "Speculative Geology" -- From those weird ass right angle mountains around Mordor to the hard-edged geologizing in Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars Trilogy. the earth sciences are an important and tricky part of much speculative fiction! Moderator Eric Williams; panelists Avery Parks, Shlomi Harif, Lauren C. Teffeau. [
Shlomi Harif was absent.] 

Holly Walrath and William Ledbetter.
Bill writes, sells, and publishes
after a career in aerospace.
(See "Space Tries to Kill You" in the next post.)
It was disappointing. They all just said that Nature is Important and Trees and Rocks are Important and a lot of stories have Trees and Rocks in them. They did note that plate tectonics was still being debated (sometimes acrimoniously) when classic scifi of the 1960s was being written and they said that there is a lot of Martian geology in Kim Stanley Robinson's Mars Trilogy. 

In the Q&A, I asked if there was any speculative geology the way we have FTL and tachyon drives in speculative physics for science fiction. They said that new discoveries of exoplanets show that our solar system model of small rocky planets inside and gas giants outside seems not to be common after all. And we moved on from there. 

[Edit 4 Oct 2025. None of the panelists was a practicing geologist, though Lauren Teffeau and Avery Parks had worked in the subject area as students. "Eric Williams is a geologist and writer living on the lithified remains of a Cretaceous seaway in Austin, TX." -- see  https://neutralspaces.co/ericwilliams/ In the introductions, Avery Parks said that minored in geology in college. Lauren C. Teffeau identified herself as an enthusiast only, saying that she makes geology an important aspect of her worldbuilding. She did not say then but it is true that one of her genres is Solarpunk, alternate futures in which homebrew systems for energy and ecology repair the damages from our time. Avery Parks also has published Solarpunk] 

Moderator Eric Williams posited that geology itself is a speculative science because unlike experimental sciences geology can only create narratives to explain discoveries. He also offered the rapidly rotating planet in Hal Clement's Mission of Gravity as an example of speculative geology. And the panel agreed that Kim Stanley Robinson's Red Mars-Green Mars-Blue Mars makes a character out of the geology of the planet. Ann McCaffrey's Crystal Singers was among others mentioned as was "La Mort de la Terre" (1910) by J-H Rosny in which hematite crystals prey on animals with iron in their blood. (Edit in 2 November 2025: See also on NecessaryFacts "In Suspect Terrain" a review of John McPhee's biography of geologist Anita G. Harris. Plate tectonics does not explain everything.)  

InfiniVox publishes anthologies 
with more science in the fiction.
 
After a difficult launch, it was up and out into other times and stranger spaces and I really benefited from the experience. Working the Con Suite, I loaded in ice and sliced cucumbers, and made time to sit and listen to published writers bragging and complaining.  At Registration, it was easy enough to find packets for those who registered in advance. I also made a point of escorting people to the elevators or the Art Show because "Over there" does not always work in a crowded room. 

 
Georgia Day at her table
 I met Georgia Day last year when we had tables near each other in the Dealers Room. She bought a new-in-the-box binocular microscope for her father. (I held it for a year trying to get the manufacturer to agree that they shipped me two, not one. Then, I just gave up...) Anyway, I confess that I am not a reader or at least not an avid reader of fiction. Some scifi writers claim 50 books a year while writing and marketing. They must not move their lips when they read. And so, I cut and paste this: 
"Of Sand and Bone by Georgia Day is an adventurous tale about a girl named Rue who sets out on a life-changing journey after a tragedy strikes that turns her life upside down. She meets a mysterious woman named Connor who is on a journey of her own. Together, they set off into the desert where they find loneliness, isolation, and an unforgiving landscape. Along the way, they meet many odd characters, some friendly and helpful while others are deadly enemies. 


Author Georgia Day’s writing style is sparse but deep and thoughtful, and her words float together in a poetic fashion. Of Sand and Bone is brilliant at times in its portrayal of the human mind as it journeys onward through unimaginable difficulties and trials. Every character, from Connor and Rue to the people they meet along the way, is a pleasing combination of realism and storybook fantasy. The author has made each character fascinating in their own unique way. I enjoyed reading Of Sand and Bone and found myself drawn into the personal struggles of the main characters. With each laborious step through the hot sand and under the merciless sun, I found myself cheering for them to keep going. Their journey became my journey, only I experienced it from the safety of my home. This novel succeeds in pulling the reader in for an immersive, enjoyable experience that won't soon be forgotten. I highly recommend Of Sand and Bone by Georgia Day. - Reviewed by Scott Cahan for Readers' Favorite. (https://readersfavorite.com/book-review/of-sand-and-bone)


Michelle Muenzler was a panelist on "Novel or Short Story?" at ArmadilloCon 39 (2017)  chaired by Louise Marley, with T. Eric Bakutis, Urania Fung, Patrice Sarath, and William Browning Spencer. 

She is also known as The Cookie Woman because she brings her homemade treats to the convention. I am not a sweet-toothed person, but I give in for her ginger snaps and other creations. She also writes well. More to the point, she reads aloud well. Not all authors do. Some just rush through the words as if they were reading silently to themselves. Others are hesitant in front of an audience, uncertain if this is going over well. Some people are performers and Michelle carries herself well. Reading her new short story, "In the Wet and the Pine" (Road Kill: Texas Horror volume 10, to be released) she was expressive while making good eye contact around the room, left-center-right. I bought her collection, The Hills of Meat, the Forest of Bone: A Broken Cities Novella (Falstaff Books, 2016), from Siros Books in the Dealers Room. The lesson I learned: there is no safety in numbers when the thing in the woods can eat a dozen people at once. 
 

Sunday, June 1, 2025

The Legacy of Vannevar Bush (Part 3: Conclusion)

The response to Pres. Roosevelt’s request closes with Appendix 5: “Report to the Committee of Publication of Scientific Information.” It is short and to the point: except for considerations of military necessity, all scientific publications must return to their culture of sharing and openness. Appendix 4: “Report of the Committee on Discovery and Development of Scientific Talent” addressed the immediate shortage of scientists and projected that demand into the future. Moreover, science exists within a wider culture  so the committee insisted that nothing recommended here should interfere with the recruitment and development of talented people in the social sciences, arts, and humanities. 


“Table 8 shows that for every four able boys in the upper quarter, there were six able girls. Table 11 shows that the ratio of able boys to able girls in the upper quarter enrolled in college was 6 to 4.5. Thus, it is clear that the greatest social and personal loss of human resources comes in the ranks of able girls in the upper quarter” (Page 198) 

Persons who receive benefits under the plan should be selected solely on the basis of merit, without regard to sex, race, color, or creed. -- Page 170.


“Likewise proposals for recruiting more college students into the physical and biological sciences and enlisting more graduate students for training in research in the physical and biological sciences should be viewed in the light of the over-all needs of the country and of the requirements in other fields of research and in the several professions. If too many of the limited number of high quality students are absorbed by fields of scientific research, research in the social sciences and in the arts and humanities may be jeopardized with probably unfavorable reactions upon scientific research.”  — Page 204

“As said in the general preamble to this report, we think that plans for the discovery and development of scientific talent should have a limit related to the needs of the Nation as a whole for trained talent in all activities that are necessary for the national welfare. We think, also as stated, that while we have no fears that too much top ability can be found and developed there is some danger that too many scientists of less than top ability may be trained, thereby debasing the currency of scientific training to the point where scientific careers may not look attractive either to the best or to the second best.”  — page 168

“The findings of this study, in harmony with the findings of other studies, show that approximately as many of the ablest high school graduates are out of college as are in college. 

“On the basis of the sample (of 1,754 cases), the upper quarter of the State’s 16,000 high school graduates would contain a minimum of 4,000 of the ablest individuals, the type of students who really do well in college. Forty-nine percent of 4,000 is 1,960 individuals with high potential college ability, who for some reason or reasons, did not enroll in college. From the point of view of the colleges, as well as of the individuals and of society, the loss in human resources indicated in these data is highly significant.”  Page 197-198

[Citations above are from —“The Utilization of Potential College Ability Found in June 1940, Graduates of Kentucky High Schools,” by Horace Leonard Davis. Bulletin of the Bureau of School Service, College of Education, University of Kentucky. Vol. XV. No. 1. Sept. 1942. — given on page 198]

Total probable deficit due to war 1941 through 1955. Chemistry, Engineering, Geology, Mathematics, Physics, Psychology, and Biological Sciences: 16,870.


“… it takes at least 6 years from college entry to achieve a doctor’s degree or its equivalent in science or engineering.”— page 3, and the fact is repeated on 27, 156, 166, 177-9, and 182.


"No matter how capable and gifted boys and girls may be, if they do not have opportunities to complete elementary and high school, they cannot go on to college and thence to graduate school for research training." -- Page 192 


“All economic groups, except the highest salaried group, are represented in the highest one percentile class.” — (Page 198)


“Brightest seniors are not going to college." (Page 199)


An Indiana study published in 1922 showed:

If we compare the records made on our tests by the group of seniors representing the richest and the poorest homes, we find that there are proportionally more children possessing the highest grades of mental ability among the poorest class than among the wealthiest class, and more individuals with high average grades of intelligence among the wealthier than among the poorer group. The wealthiest group ranks high on central tendency. The poorest salaried group ranks low on central tendency and also has a larger percentage of individuals possessing the lower grades of mental ability.

But there are individuals in this class who obtain the highest intelligence rating made by high school seniors. * * * (Page 161) 


"It is still more significant that so many of this most superior group of high-school seniors will not attend college, while those with the most inferior grades of intelligence are planning to attend, in ever increasing numbers. Twenty-five percent of the brightest seniors found in the entire State said they were not planning to attend college at all, while 65 to 70 percent of the dullest seniors had definitely decided to go to college, most of them having already selected the college they expected to attend."



PREVIOUSLY ON NECESSARYFACTS

The Legacy of Vannevar Bush (Part 1) 

Vannevar Bush’s Legacy Part 2) 

The Scientific Method (2016) 

The Scientific Method (2021) 



Sunday, May 25, 2025

Vannevar Bush’s Legacy (Part 2)

Bush’s introductory essay ran 40 pages. The committee reports take 160. Of those, Part Three: Science and the Public Welfare, (beginning with its own introduction, “Appendix 3”) comprises 64 pages (70 to 134). It included seven tables of results from questionnaires sent to 315 leading colleges and universities, of which 188 replied in whole or in part. The data all were generally about staffing and funding and the counts upon which those were built. Much of the specific relevance has been lost to time. However, the broad narrative remains important: leading institutions are primaries because they invest in research. 

An interesting counterpoint came from an unidentified school devoted exclusively to teaching: “It is my opinion that the Federal Government should not undertake to establish any far-reaching program for the support of research either in public or private colleges or universities. I do not believe that such relations can be permanently established and maintained without involving political control which has proved so disastrous in Germany and other totalitarian states.”


That warning was presaged by Vannevar Bush himself in his introductory comments and other summaries: centralized political control would prevent the most fruitful research specifically because those advances cannot be predicted and controlled.


Bush says up front (page 88): “But we do not believe that any program is better than no program…” The tabulated data in Part Three reveals the many distinctions that define each of the 188 intellectual enterprises.


Science—The Endless Frontier (1945; republished 1960, 1990, 2020) was Vannevar Bush’s report to President Franklin Delano Roosevelt in response to the President’s direct request that four problems be addressed:

First: What can be done, consistent with military security, and with the prior approval of the military authorities, to make known to the world as soon as possible the contributions which have been made during our war effort to scientific knowledge? The diffusion of such knowledge should help us stimulate new enterprises, provide jobs for our returning servicemen and other workers, and make possible great strides for the improvement of the national well-being.

Second: With particular reference to the war of science against disease, what can be done now to organize a program for continuing in the future the work which has been done in medicine and related sciences? The fact that the annual deaths in this country from one or two diseases alone are far in excess of the total number of lives lost by us in battle during this war should make us conscious of the duty we owe future generations.

Third: What can the Government do now and in the future to aid research activities by public and private organizations? The proper roles of public and of private research, and their interrelation, should be carefully considered.

Fourth: Can an effective program be proposed for discovering and developing scientific talent in American youth so that the continuing future of scientific research in this country may be assured on a level comparable to what has been done during the war?

Working on a federal project in 1996, I was exposed to one concrete innovation resulting from these proposals. In 1944, Civil Service was dedicated to clerical, fiscal, and custodial positions (page 112). In order to bring the best scientists to government employment, the committee headed by Isaiah Bowman (president of Johns Hopkins University), recommended requiring college degrees of all scientists employed under Civil Service. 

“The standards for entrance into scientific and professional positions in the Government should be approximately those maintained for comparable posts in universities and industries. Civil Service positions are subjected to continuous political pressure to relax entrance requirements; and recently the educational requirements for a number of scientific classifications have been removed. This opens the way to possible appointments by personal favoritism and political preference. Action should be taken immediately to re-establish the requirement of a university or college degree for entrance into all scientific and professional services. Exceptions in especially meritorious cases should be granted only upon recommendation of qualified scientists.” (Page 112. [Note that in all editions, differences in prefaces and introductions do not alter the fact that the canonic text is typeset identically].

When I was on that federal project some 50 years later, several of my coworkers had been newly hired into advanced positions because they had (1) college degrees and (2) been graduated with honors, such as dean’s list, magna cum laude, etc. 


PREVIOUSLY ON NECESSARY FACTS


Science versus Common Sense 

Science Fair: A National Geographic Film 

The Science of Liberty 

The Philosophical Breakfast Club