The
combat veterans who recommended Joe Haldeman’s The Forever War to me spoke at length about a passing detail and failed
to identify the important elements of the plot, the theme, or the setting. It
is true that relativistic travel will transform you into a visitor from the
past. As a soldier, you will be fighting with archaic weapons. But my officers
provided more detail there than was found in the novel itself. And they left
out the part where everyone in the future is gay.
“In my work, it always comes back to the jungle. Walking through the stillness with fear at your back but, paradoxically, the power of life and death in the chunk of metal in your hands. I’ve never been so weirdly alive, and everything I write is refracted through that lens of experience.” -- “Answering the Call,” by Joe Haldeman, Proceedings of the USNI, April 2011.
Haldeman
was a combat engineer in Viet Nam. So, from the first appearance as a series in
Analog in 1974, and through its
republications, the story has been offered as being “about Viet Nam” and consequently
“anti-war.” It is true that the work was
shaped by the author’s experience of war. It is also true that some of the
elements of the war between Humans and Taurans reflect that earlier time and place. The
Taurans are effective collectivists, willing to sacrifice large numbers in
concerted actions. They do not invent new technologies but copy ours. Nonetheless,
there’s a lot missing: the “bright shining lies” that victory is around the
corner, that our local allies share our values, that our local allies are not
as bad as or worse than the enemy; the dark truth that many of the people at
home, and also many of the conscripts themselves, are actively opposed to the
war. The easy wrapper is that the strengths and attractions of this story are
transcendent of time and place.
The
weaknesses are those elements that are inextricable from the author's own lifetime. In this future, soldiers are required to sleep in male-female pairs drawn by lot. The burden of
orgy falls on the females. Although the army is half female, the only failures
we see up close are theirs: one grunt panicking while trapped in rockslide; one
officer whose command goes to her head. It is also true that you cannot fault
the author for the book he did not write; and it is easier to see the future of
1974 from 2017.
PREVIOUSLY ON NECESSARY FACTS
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.