It has been claimed that at least one of the terrorists of
Paris November 13 hid among Syrian refugees to gain entrance into Europe. On
the basis of that, some (Republican) governors of American states have declared
that they will not accept Syrian refugees sent to them by the federal
government. But immigrants to America have been associated with crimes since
1492. Immigrants also bring enterprise, initiative, invention, and, most of
all, descendants.
 |
| Michael Ansara, perhaps best known for his role as Cochise in Broken Arrow, was also Star Trek's Kang, above as "Soldier" from The Outer Limits. |
In the wake of the French Revolution, Federalists and
Republicans both supported and opposed the immigration of French refugees,
depending on who was referring to whom.
To the Federalists, the French Revolution was the expression of
everything evil in democracy. However,
many of the refugees were aristocrats, fleeing the Terror.
(And that is another point for another essay: Terrorism, as
we understand it today, was invented by a native government. The Reign of
Terror was not imported from Arabia.)
Those aristocrats were worrisome for the Republicans whose sympathies were with the Revolutionaries. However, the Revolutionary government
of France sent spies. Its envoys interfered in American politics, attempting to
influence our foreign policy. For all of that, and more, see the website of the Office of the
Historian of the U.S. Department of State here.
 |
| Anousha Ansari, entrepreneur, ISS astronaut and co-founder of the Ansari X-Prize. |
Long established as proper Bostonians, the English in
America were appalled by the Irish immigrants of 1848. They lived like animals,
bred like animals -- and bred crime. Or so the English of Boston claimed. Among
the consequences of Irish in America was the cliché of the Irish cop, established
following the War Between the States, and enduring even today. Another cliché
was the Irish army sergeant.
Many had enlisted in the North and South in order
to obtain military experience that they could take home to fight Great Britain.
Many more stayed here. And their descendants supported terrorism for over 150
years. With the founding of Sinn Fein in 1905, evermore American money flowed
into the conflict.
We worry today about Arab Americans and Islamic Americans
supporting terrorism now, but no one was concerned when “professional Irish” in
America paid for revolution in Ireland and terrorism in the United Kingdom.
 |
| Like Boston and New York, Cleveland was a center of Finnianism. |
They were not alone. In the 1930s and 1940s, both Nazi Germany and Communist
Russia maintained huge networks of supporters. It is also quite likely that the USSR insinuated its agents into the stream of European refugees from World War II. Similarly, communist agents probably were among the Vietnamese. We know that China sends its operatives in as students. Disturbing as that is to consider, actual harm is harder to prove.
Homegrown socialists, whether
Fascist, Bolshevik, or others were common enough. Our coinage of the era should
appear shocking to any thinking person today. It was not an accident: many progressives and intellectuals of the late 19th through mid-20th centuries were collectivists. In Aldous
Huxley’s Brave New World, the clones were named after great collectivists of
the times, Polly Trotsky, Lenina Crowne, and Benito Hoover, and others. In our time, the political leaders charged with defeating ISIL actually share many of its philosophical foundations: mysticism, revelation, altruism and collectivism, and ascetisim.
 |
| Fasces on American dime 1917-1945. German half mark and US quarter dollar. |
Among the spies for the USSR was Samuel Dickstein, a US
Congressman and New York Supreme Court justice. Meanwhile Prescott Bush, scion
to the presidents of our time was able to get out of being implicated in a Wall
Street Coup against President Roosevelt. The German-American Bund pushed the Nazi Party line here at home. It only resulted in more anti-German sentiment. Unlike the Japanese, the Germans were not put in concentrations camps - it was a possibility. In the movie Wings, about World War I, when the comic German, Arnold Schwimpf enlists with his buddies, the recruiting sergeant (an Irishman) says, "If you ask me, all you Dutchmen ought to be locked up until this thing is over." Those were heady times. And America survived.
Civilization will survive ISIL.
Civilization will survive ISIL.
Ayn Rand used the term “muscle mystic” (likely invented by Nathaniel Branden) to explain people who worship brute force. They thought that seizing factories would make them productive. They saw goosestepping rows and columns followed by arrays of tanks and mobile artillery, and accepted that whoever brandished them must be strong. In fact, reality and reason required that the Nazis and Communists would fail. So, too, is ISIL's program ultimately unworkable.
According to the news reports now about the Paris bombings,
this murder of 180 people was carefully planned and executed over months. Over 700 million people live in Europe,
about 68 million of them in France. A million years will not be enough time for the terrorists to kill everyone they dislike.
Meanwhile, immigrants to Europe and the USA and everywhere
else bring valuable human capital away from ISIL.
Yes, some may be criminals, as were the boys at Five Points,
the Purple Gang, and the Mafia. It is a fact of human population distribution,
however, that there must be at least as many Kennedys, Reagans, Einsteins, Fermis, Scalias, and Ayn Rands. And the creative work of good people outlasts the destruction by evil people.
It is an axiom of criminology that "crime knows no neighborhood." In other words, no place, no population is especially criminogenic. Crimes are committed by individuals who make bad choices. That is why Dr. Martin Luther King's dream was a world where a person is judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin. The basic error, the fundamental fallacy, is considering masses of people as collectives. Including or excluding groups, tribes, ethnicities, etc., is the wrong way to consider the question. In point of fact, US immigration policy requires each legal immigrant to prove their case on their own merits. That is appropriate.
ALSO ON NECESSARY FACTS
