For the fourth time, I served as a judge for behavioral and
social sciences in our local science fair. Again, I met an array of talented and motivated
teenagers. They were intelligent
(of course), actively curious about the world around them, willing to step out
from the crowd and put themselves in the scales to be judged. They asked interesting questions and
pursued the answers wherever the data took them. But they were, after all, children. Some of them assumed far too easily that
an experiment that does not validate the hypothesis is therefore a
failure. They never heard of Karl
Popper. That failing is not
theirs, but of their mentors – or the lack of them.
Middle school (junior high) presentation on noise levels in the school building |
We expect a lot from kids. The German word for “teenager” is
Halbstark: half-strong. That
speaks to the core of the problem in a way that the Latin “adolescent”
(becoming adult) does not. My
daughter had a mole on her wrist; and she would show me how it moved around as
she grew. For them, life is an
intense process. We judge them as
if they were adults. As a geometer
would say, it is obvious by inspection
that they are not. Yet, objectively, nothing less is fair to them in the
intellectual pursuit of science.
“If you all were graded on a 100-point scale, 91 would be
failing.” As often as I said it, I
could see that it did not sink in, not this year, not in the previous years. This year, I asked one panicked entrant if any other display was clearly head
and shoulders better than hers.
The person with the neighboring display chimed in: “The right answer is
‘No.’”
Middle School entry: What is Your "Pawsonality"? Can a psychological profile predict your preference for a pet? |
It is not just kids at science fairs. I enter and I judge museum quality
exhibits at numismatic conventions.
(“Four out of five? How dare they!”) In the West Wing
episodes that bridge the first and second seasons, President Jed Bartlett says
that decisions are made by those who
show up. In this context, the
future of science, engineering, and technology belongs to – and will be claimed
by – those who enter the competitive field of scientific research.
Another middle school entry on the Stroop Effect. This took second place. The value in this for the learner is figuring out how to create a novel experiment and enter it in a competition. |
The best of them do it alone; but they all deserve
mentoring. That 9-point gap between
first and last could easily be closed by a working technician, engineer, or
scientist who made the time to volunteer with a school starting in August or
September. It is not a matter of showing them how, but of asking science-talented pupils those tough questions early
on.
PREVIOUSLY ON NECESSARY FACTS
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.