It is not the movie that I would have
made; but it was not my movie to make. If I had directed the effort, then other
people would be criticizing my work.
It is easy to find complaints from fans. Mine are below. They stem from the fact that we all have had the film in our
heads for years, even decades. We
all imagined it. However, none of
us actually realized our imaginings.
John Aglialoro did. With
productive investment from Harmon Kaslow, Scott DeSapio. Ed Snider, David
Kelley and a large body of fans (among them my daughter), Aglialoro finally brought Ayn Rand’s
masterpiece to the screen.
Ahead of me in line, another generation of fans. |
Ayn Rand taught that contradictory premises result in conflicting and unreconcilable conclusions. One example from AS3 was the
mother in the Valley who said that she chose to homeschool her children, rather
than hand them over to a school that did not teach them to think. Was there an alternative? Any kids in the Valley
would be “homeschooled” one way or another. There was no public school for them to attend.
Even though the heroes of AS3 had several reasons to escape an oppressive society, you do not need to go to Galt’s Gulch to homeschool your children.
Would it not be a huge mistake for her to keep her kids "at home" when they could be learning arithmetic at the Mulligan Bank? The very idea that children should not work but be in school was an interventionist political plan to keep them from competing for jobs against unskilled adults. As the d'Anconia mine is delved by human labor, perhaps the children could put in 12 hours a day to benefit from the experience of learning first hand about the early industrial revolution. Well, perhaps not...
September 19. On the "Galt's Gulch" discussion board contributor LetsShrug pointed out that in fact, the scene is from the book. I found it on page 730 of the New American Library paperback. The line about homeschooling was not an element from the work of Ayn Rand. It was just another sop thrown to the conservatives.
Even though the heroes of AS3 had several reasons to escape an oppressive society, you do not need to go to Galt’s Gulch to homeschool your children.
Would it not be a huge mistake for her to keep her kids "at home" when they could be learning arithmetic at the Mulligan Bank? The very idea that children should not work but be in school was an interventionist political plan to keep them from competing for jobs against unskilled adults. As the d'Anconia mine is delved by human labor, perhaps the children could put in 12 hours a day to benefit from the experience of learning first hand about the early industrial revolution. Well, perhaps not...
September 19. On the "Galt's Gulch" discussion board contributor LetsShrug pointed out that in fact, the scene is from the book. I found it on page 730 of the New American Library paperback. The line about homeschooling was not an element from the work of Ayn Rand. It was just another sop thrown to the conservatives.
- The coins obviously were not gold. The props were brass. Alongside Night had a real gold coin.
- We already met Jim Taggart before the marquee card identified him.
- The names on the ceiling of producers who spent the first night in Galt’s home included many who were not in the book. Among them was Ashish Gulhati, an open source hacker from India. I am happy for him; and pleased that he was included. However, it was not canonical. That being so, this was in fact a reward to contributors to the financing of the movie.
- Where did the Wyatt workers come from?
- Where did the d’Anconia workers come from?
- Cool as was his airplane – a Lockheed Electra? – Galt’s plane was not powered by his own motor.
- Dr. Robert Stadler was soft-pedaled, not identified as the government-funded researcher whose intelligence serves brutality, whose own contradictions made that not just possible but necessary.
- When meeting Mr. Thompson, how did Galt have a cell phone in his pocket? Why was he not searched?
Every work is a matrix of trade-offs. From Spaceflight Technology, Howard Seifert, ed., New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1959. |
The movie offered many more positives. Kristoffer Polaha’s performance was
masterful. His facial expressions
spoke volumes. He “got” the part:
he understood the context. He
carried Dagny into the bedroom and laid her down. “I can walk,” she said. “I know,” replied. In shot after shot, he is aware,
intelligent, focused, and yet
envisioning a wider horizon. In
the scene where he is captured, he was amused by the mental simplicity of Mr. Thompson. When Galt is being tortured and Dr. Ferris asks, “How are we
doing?” Galt’s facial reply is
miles deep.
The door scene was good. When Dagny pleads with John not to return to the City, they
are still symbolically separated by a gulf of misunderstanding.
The scene in Galt's apartment when the Feds force the door to the motor was perfect, right out of the book.
The scene in Galt's apartment when the Feds force the door to the motor was perfect, right out of the book.
The best choice was to present this as a love story. Atlas Shrugged works on many levels. The girl-finds-boy thread was a dependable trope for Ayn
Rand. Similarly, most readers
easily see The Fountainhead as Howard
Roark’s biography (which it is) but miss the counterpoint of Dominique
Francon’s narrative. Here, the
female lead is front and center.
Overall, this was a finesse. The producers, director, actors, and cinematography team all achieved as much (if not more) on $5 million as the first installment (also a grand achievement) did on fifteen. "Third time is the charm."
Overall, this was a finesse. The producers, director, actors, and cinematography team all achieved as much (if not more) on $5 million as the first installment (also a grand achievement) did on fifteen. "Third time is the charm."
ALSO ON NECESSARY FACTS
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.