Nominated for both an Academy of Motion
Picture Arts and Sciences award ("Oscar") and a Hollywood Foreign Press
Association (“Golden Globe”) award, the drama is compelling. The movie began
as a Broadway play. Live theater is continuous rehearsal for the writer and
director no less than for the cast. So, it came to the screen fully formed. But
it does not stand up to repeated viewing. As a legal battle engaged in a
courtroom, the intensity is irresistible. Contradicting that is the
“naturalist” assumption that victory is impossible, that a draw is the best you
can hope for.
Most of the $33
million in production costs went for salaries.
Tom Cruise got $12.5 million. Jack Nicholson was paid $5 million. Demi
Moore accepted only $2 million for the chance to take on a “genderless” role.
(One production insider wanted to know why if she is not going to sleep with
the lead is the character a woman? Aaron Sorkin called that his worst
experience as a screenwriter. That and more on Mental Floss here.) But any competent screen actors could have had the roles. In fact, Rob Lowe
played the lead for a year on Broadway. Regardless of who played the parts,
they would still have had to act like Sailors and Marines. Most of them failed
at that and the fault lies with the director and producer, Rob Reiner.
Writer Aaron
Sorkin and director Rob Reiner have no military experience and they apparently
had no military support. So, the production projected an embarrassing lack of
military bearing. Lacking US DoD support, Reiner apparently did not hire a
military advisor. (Michael McClosky is credited as “Major Michael McClosky” but
I found no corroboration for his military rank.) The most glaring evidence is
in Demi Moore’s portrayal of LCDR JoAnne Galloway. We might accept LTJG Daniel
Kaffee (played by Tom Cruise) whose hands are always his pockets in order to
signal us that he is the cocky underachiever whose long string of successes
came from plea bargaining. But there is no way that an investigator from the
inspector general’ s office who is two grades above him would put up with that.
Here is a rhetorical question: What do
you do when you have your hands in your pockets? Answer: You better be taking
something out of your pockets. It is completely unacceptable that LTJG
Kaffee is eating an apple as he enters LCDR Galloway’s office. He might try it, but an IG investigator outranking him would give him a corrective interview immediately. Also unacceptable
is her introducing herself as “JoAnne…, uh, Jo…” On target is the reply from 1LT (MC) Jonathan
Kendrick: “May I call you Jonathan?” “No, you may not. You may call me
Lieutenant Kendrick because when we have to go somewhere to fight, you Navy
boys always provide a nice ride.” That is a stock response, a cliché, and a fact of
life. On the other hand, it was for the audience’s benefit that COL Jessep
reprimands his executive officer, LTC Matthew Markinson. “Don’t ever contradict
me in front of another officer,” is the kind of warning that (a) never would
have needed to be said or (b) at worst, was settled between them three years
ago.
Within the
naturalist school of aesthetics, the universe is indifferent to human action.
Technically, that is correct; and it is that which allows success. The universe
is not hostile. However, aesthetic naturalism is disingenuous. The inherent
indifference of the universe actually means that each victory must be balanced
by an equal or greater loss: you can never win. It is not just that there is a
cost. Of course, everything costs. But to naturalism the final costs always
outweigh the temporary benefits. Therefore, in this story, the accused Marines
are found not guilty of murder, but are dishonorably discharged. The slower of the
two (LCP Harold Dawson) still does not understand the verdict as they are led
away. In the final moment, as recompense, LTJG Kaffee tells PFC Downey that he
does not need an armband (his chevrons) to have honor. In return, the Private
calls himself to attention and salutes the officer—which he refused to do
earlier when he felt that the Lieutenant was not honorable enough to defend him.
But for the Private, the dishonorable discharge is the worst possible outcome at
the moment. He and the Lance Corporal were willing to suffer life in prison
rather than to betray the officers who ordered them to haze (and thereby accidentally
kill) their barracks mate. They were willing to accept all of the consequence
of following orders. The betrayals by those officers who gave the orders and sought
to cover up the murder and their roles in it is not deeply explored but only
held up to view for a moment. LTC Markinson’s suicide, hallmarked by a letter
to the parents of the victim, would have been a better focal point for the
drama. In the universe of aesthetic naturalism, no person or act is more
important than another. Naturalism denies the heroic by trivializing it, and at
the same time giving focus to the unimportant.
According to the
media histories Aaron Sorkin based his screenplay on a real event at Naval
Station Guantanamo Bay. Sorkin’s sister was in the JAG Corps, and she told him
the story. After the play became a movie, four lawyers claimed that they were
the models for the character of LTJG Daniel Kaffee. (See “Four Lawyers Claimed …” New York Times,
here.) See also the true story of the accused and exonerated Marine that came to light when his
body was found in a riverbed (“Ex-Marine who felt 'A Few Good Men'
maligned him is mysteriously murdered,” by Bill Glauber, Sun Staff Writer, Baltimore Sun, April 10, 1994, here).
Naturalism is
supposedly an unvarnished, journalistic recounting. Fiction is a convenient medium
for telling the truth. But that is not what happens. The truth is always complicated,
and how you simplify it depends on who you are. The Romantic theory is that
people come into conflict when their chosen values are opposed. Even the bad
guys are purposeful. But evil is powerless. Therefore, the good guys win, even
when (as always) victory is purchased at a cost. In the universe of Romantic fiction, that cost
brings a value worth the price. In the universe of Naturalism, even if there are "a few good men" it is not clear who they are.
PREVIOUSLY ON NECESSARY FACTS
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.